HARTFORD, Conn. – A long-awaited, bipartisan compromise state budget agreement — repeatedly dubbed historic — was expected to pass the Connecticut Senate early Thursday morning with strong support, possibly ending a monthslong budget impasse.
Continue Reading Below
Both Democratic and Republican senators praised the two-year plan crafted by legislative leaders. They described it as a way to finally end the stalemate and accompanying fiscal chaos across the state, as well as to help address the state’s long-running financial woes.
“Connecticut is really desperate for something good, like a bipartisan budget that really makes sense for the long-term,” said Republican Sen. Scott Frantz of Greenwich, the Senate co-chairman of the Finance Revenue and Bonding Committee. “It’s really good for our reputation, which we have a lot of work to do to improve.”
Legislative leaders were optimistic about the level of bipartisan support for the roughly $41 billion, two-year proposal in both the Senate and the House of Representatives, which was scheduled to vote later Thursday morning. It remained unclear whether Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy would sign the budget into law and whether leaders would need to garner enough votes to override a possible veto.
“We’re hopeful this will be a collegial and consensus conclusion,” said Democratic Senate President Martin Looney of New Haven, who noted how it’s been about a decade since there’s been a bipartisan vote on a new state budget. At that time, the state had a budget surplus to work with. This year, legislators had to grapple with a projected two-year $3.5 billion deficit and the closest partisan makeup of the General Assembly in modern times.
Connecticut has been without a state budget in place since the new fiscal year began July 1. Malloy has run the state using his limited executive spending authority as legislators struggled to cover a $3.5 billion deficit in a roughly $40 billion, two-year budget. That’s meant cuts to social service programs and schools as well as confusion and angst among municipal leaders attempting to balance their own budgets.
Continue Reading Below
ADVERTISEMENT
One national credit rating agency is considering downgrading or assigning negative outlooks to more than 50 cities and towns because of the impasse.
Legislative leaders announced early Tuesday they had reached bipartisan agreement on the final details of a budget that was crafted without Malloy in the room. While aware the protracted process has taken a toll, lawmakers contend the end product includes budgetary reforms such as new or detailed caps on spending and borrowing, required votes on union contracts and a hard hiring freeze.
“If we are to save the state on the fiscal basis, we need those changes yesterday,” Frantz said. “And this budget does it without any net tax increases of any significance.”
But Republican Sen. Len Suzio, of Meriden, said he was voting no, arguing the plan relies too heavily on higher taxes and fees. The list includes a 45-cent-per-pack increase in the cigarette tax, a 25-cent fee on ridesharing services such as Uber, a scaled-back earned income tax credit and increased fees for land record filings to criminal history record checks.
“I thought we learned a lesson that we don’t balance the budget by imposing large tax increases on the people of Connecticut,” said Suzio, who counted 17 tax increases but only four tax breaks, such as exempting Social Security, pension and annuity income from the personal income tax.
He also criticized the budget for sweeping revenue generated from a surcharge on consumer utility bills. That money earmarked for solar and energy efficiency programs. The two business groups that represent the solar and energy efficiency industry announced Wednesday they will pursue legal action to block lawmakers from using the money to help balance the state budget.
There appeared to be support among lawmakers for a new Passport to Parks program, a dedicated funding stream for the state’s 109 state parks, which have been the victims of budget cutbacks in recent years. In return for an additional $10 charge on the $80 motor vehicle registration fee, registered passenger vehicles would be allowed to park free at all state parks. Out-of-state visitors would still have to pay parking fees at certain parks.
