Tinder’s $2B lawsuit against parent company to proceed to jury trial

FAN Editor

IAC/InterActiveCorp and its subsidiary Match Group, which runs Match.com and Tinder, were dealt a blow Tuesday when an appeals court rejected their attempt to dismiss a $2 billion lawsuit filed against them by executives at Tinder, according to a report.

Continue Reading Below

The ruling is a small victory for several current and former employees of Tinder, including three of the dating app’s founders,  who have sued IAC and  Match Group for allegedly blocking employees from exercising stock options and misled them about the app’s valuation.

The judge also ruled that Tinder’s founders and the other plaintiffs were not bound by the valuations of their stakes in the parent company, which they argued in court papers were manipulated to appear lower than they actually were, Reuters reported.

Stocks in this Article

$n.a.

n.a. (n.a.)

$n.a.

n.a. (n.a.)

“Although the parties agreed that the value of their stock options would be determined by the valuation process,” the five-judge appeals court panel wrote in its decision obtained by Reuters, “nothing in the agreements provided that the valuation would be binding or final or that the parties would be precluded from fully disputing the valuation in court.”

The dating app’s founders, along with current executives and other employees, filed the lawsuit in August of 2018 against both parties for allegedly bilking them by manipulating financial information to create a lowball estimate of Tinder’s value. Tinder is seeking at least $2 billion.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The lawsuit claims that there were written contracts between IAC and Match and Tinder employees, including founders Sean Rad, Justin Mateen and Jonathan Badeen. The contracts required Tinder be valued on specific dates in 2017, 2018, 2020 and 2021 and that the workers should be allowed to exercise their stock options and sell them to IAC and Match.

The court papers further allege New York-based IAC and Match instead created false financial information, delayed new products and used other tactics to try to keep Tinder’s valuation low. Tinder was then merged into Match Group, which the lawsuit says was a pretext to extinguish Tinder employees’ stock options.

TINDER CO-FOUNDERS SUE PARENT COMPANY FOR $2 BILLION

Tinder is worth more than $20 billion today, spokesperson for the dating app’s attorney said.

The appeals court’s ruling on Tuesday was in line with New York State Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla’s June 13 decision, which argued they could pursue certain legal claims, such as prospective economic advantage, breach of contract and intentional interference, Reuters reported.

In a statement provided to FOX Business, an IAC spokesperson said: “This baseless lawsuit has no more merit today than it did over a year ago when it was filed. We look forward to defending ourselves in court.”

MATCH GROUP SUBPOENAED BY DOJ

Both IAC and Match sued Rad in January 2019 for allegedly secretly copying the companies’ information, and later submitted a $400 million countersuit, this time for allegedly secretly recording conversations he had with his superiors, according to the news outlet.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Tinder’s attorney, Orin Snyder told FOX Business IAC and Match “cheated our clients and engaged in a brazen cover-up.”

“We are pleased that the appellate court unanimously upheld the trial court’s decision and rejected IAC’s latest maneuver to avoid a trial,” Snyder said in the prepared statement. “The evidence of IAC’s lawless behavior is mounting.  We look forward to presenting it to the jury.”

The jury trial is set for 2020.

The Associated Press and FOX Business reporter Thomas Barrabi contributed to this report.

Free America Network Articles

Leave a Reply

Next Post

Trump’s False Claim about Syrian ‘Safe Zone’

In explaining his decision to pull U.S. forces from northern Syria and allow Turkey to set up a “safe zone” in Syria, President Donald Trump falsely claimed that Turkey has lost “thousands and thousands of people from that safe zone.” “This is entirely fictional,” Asli Aydıntaşbaş, a senior policy fellow […]

You May Like