Thanks to a lingering legal issue and general weakness in the financial sector, investment banking giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) is trading for less than its book value for the first time since early 2016. While legal uncertainty can certainly be scary, at some point institutions like Goldman Sachs simply become too cheap to ignore.
With that in mind, here’s a look at the headwinds that have sent Goldman Sachs’ stock tumbling in recent weeks, and why the bank could be worth a look for long-term investors despite the near-term uncertainty.
Continue Reading Below
Short-term headwinds have pushed the stock price down
There are a few negative catalysts that have pushed Goldman Sachs’ stock price to a fresh 52-week low: poor financial sector conditions, disappointing trading revenue, and legal uncertainty. Let’s take these one at a time.
First, the financial sector as a whole. While this is a great environment for banks to grow their profits, much of the good news was already priced in at the beginning of the year. For example, tax reform alone sent many banks’ earnings higher by 30% or more, but this was widely expected upon the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The same can be said for rising interest rates — rate hikes generally translate into higher bank profit margins, but again, the Fed’s projection of several 2018 and 2019 interest hikes has been well-known for some time, and if anything, expectations have cooled off recently.
In addition, investors are concerned about the yield curve starting to invert, which not only is a pretty reliable recession predictor but is bad news for bank profitability. Because of all these reasons, the S&P 500 has increased by 1% in 2018, but the financial sector is down by 7%.
Specific to Goldman, trading revenue has been a weak spot industrywide for some time. After all, volatility has been rather low in recent years, which is good for many other aspects of investment banking but is bad for trading revenue. Not only has Goldman’s trading revenue been weak, but it’s been even weaker than the already-modest expectations in recent quarters.
Advertisement
Most recently, it was announced that Malaysia is seeking to recoup $600 million in fees it paid to Goldman in connection with a failed bond fund. The bank also faces significant legal risk from regulatory agencies in relation to this, in addition to the amount Malaysia is seeking. Uncertainty is bad for stock prices, especially when it could potentially come with a 10-figure price tag.
Extremely cheap valuation
The catalysts above have sent Goldman Sachs stock plunging to a fresh 52-week low. In fact, the bank trades for roughly 9% less than its book value, the lowest price-to-book valuation in more than two years.
A great institution with lots of potential to grow
To be clear, Goldman Sachs stock is certainly down for a reason. The inverting yield curve is definitely a concern, and trading is the bread-and-butter of the company’s business, so it’s certainly disappointing that trading revenue isn’t meeting expectations. Furthermore, the legal uncertainty related to the Malaysia situation could potentially result in a massive hit to earnings if the bank ends up paying back those fees.
Having said that, all of these are temporary concerns. Goldman is still one of the premier investment banks on Wall Street, and still holds the top market share in key areas like equity IPOs and M&A advisory. Additionally, the company’s young consumer banking business is growing at a breathtaking pace and has tons of untapped potential to leverage the bank’s brand and resources.
10 stocks we like better than Goldman SachsWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Goldman Sachs wasn’t one of them! That’s right — they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
Click here to learn about these picks!
*Stock Advisor returns as of November 14, 2018
Matthew Frankel, CFP has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
