- Mexico suspends charter company in Cuba airliner crash
- Bitcoin resembles currency experiments that failed: Robert Shiller
- EU official sees trade deal with Mercosur toward year-end
- With North Korea summit on shaky ground, Trump to press South Korean leader
- Exclusive: Ousted MGM CEO explores bid for the U.S. movie studio – sources
After a protracted confirmation battle that resurrected a raw, nationwide debate about the agency’s post-9/11 use of enhanced interrogation techniques — thought by many to have constituted torture — Gina Haspel will officially become director of the Central Intelligence Agency. She is the first operations officer in more than five decades – and the first-ever woman – to be named to the role. On Thursday, the Senate voted, 54-45, to confirm Haspel, one day after the, reported her nomination favorably. Overall, six Democrats voted in support of her candidacy; two Republicans, Sens. Flake and Paul opposed it.
President Trump, while announcing that her predecessor, former CIA director Mike Pompeo, was being tapped to lead the State Department.
Much ofwas spent in the clandestine service, and remains classified. Her reported oversight, in 2002, of a secret “black site” in Thailand — where detainees were subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding — generated widespread controversy and ardent condemnation from civil rights groups. Her involvement in ordering the destruction, in 2005, of 92 videotapes – some of which documented the interrogations — while serving as chief of staff to then-Director of the clandestine service Jose Rodriguez was also roundly criticized.
Among those opposed was Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, who survived years of torture as a POW in Vietnam, and who, as he undergoes treatment for brain cancer, was not present for the floor vote. Last week McCain issued a powerful statement opposing Haspel’s candidacy, calling her role in overseeing the use of torture by Americans “disturbing.”
“Her refusal to acknowledge torture’s immorality is disqualifying,” McCain said, citing Haspel’s reluctance, during her public hearing, to provide a “yes” or “no” answer to a question from California Democrat Sen. Kamala Harris on the subject. McCain’s opposition became a key factor in swaying Arizona Republican Sen. Jeff Flake’s vote, and was cited by a number of Democrats who spoke out against her nomination in the following days and, just before the vote, on the Senate floor.
“There is no greater voice on this subject than John McCain’s,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, citing his “powerful and unimpeachable views” as reason to oppose Haspel’s candidacy. As he had done in the weeks leading to the vote, Wyden also criticized parts of Haspel’s background, the extent to which it remained classified, and her reluctance to admit, during her hearing, that the interrogation program was morally objectionable. “This nomination process has been a disservice to our constitutional duties, to our democratic principles and to the American people,” Wyden said.
Those speaking out in favor of Haspel’s candidacy – like Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner, D-Virginia — cited, among other things, the immense support for Haspel from within the CIA. “I have heard from many Agency officers, and for that matter, members of the rank and file of other Intelligence Community agencies,” Warner, who had announced his intention to support Haspel on Tuesday, said. “And almost to a person, this rank and file have supported her nomination.”
He conceded he struggled with the decision: “To those here who have concluded that Ms. Haspel’s background with the [Rendition, Detention and Interrogation] program should preclude her from leading the CIA — I respect their arguments, and I know the passion with which they put forward their position.”
“I strongly believe that we, as Americans, have a duty to look squarely at our mistakes, and to not sweep them under the rug, but to learn from them, and in the future, to do better,” Warner said.