Britain urged to ensure promises to ‘Windrush generation’ are made law

FAN Editor
FILE PHOTO: People gather in Windrush Square to show solidarity with the Windrush generation in the Brixton district of London
FILE PHOTO: People gather in Windrush Square to show solidarity with the Windrush generation in the Brixton district of London, Britain April 20, 2018. REUTERS/Darren Staples/File Photo

April 29, 2018

By Andrew MacAskill

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain’s Prime Minister Theresa May is under pressure to introduce legislation guaranteeing promises made to long-term residents from the Caribbean who have being incorrectly labeled illegal immigrants.

For almost two weeks, British ministers have been struggling to explain why some descendants of the so-called “Windrush generation”, invited to Britain to plug labor shortfalls between 1948 and 1971, are being denied basic rights because of trouble documenting their status.

The Windrush scandal overshadowed the Commonwealth summit in London earlier this month and has raised questions about May’s six-year stint as interior minister before she became prime minister in the wake of the 2016 Brexit referendum.

The government has apologized for the fiasco, promised citizenship and compensation to those affected, including to people who have lost their jobs, been threatened with deportation and denied benefits because of the errors.

But more than 200 mainly opposition members of parliament have written to the prime minister calling for the pledges to be written into law “without delay”.

The letter accuses the interior minister Amber Rudd, who has faced calls to resign over her handling of the scandal, of making up policy “on the hoof” to defuse the situation.

Rudd is due to address parliament on Monday after giving contradictory statements about whether the government has immigration removal targets.

In a separate letter, the shadow interior minister Diane Abbott has called for a full inquiry into whether the interior minister misled parliament and breached the ministerial code.

Abbott said Rudd’s explanations as to why she had told members of parliament there were no such targets, when in fact there were, “stretch credulity to the limit”.

But May’s office said there is no need for an investigation because ministerial code only requires a resignation if a minister knowingly misleads parliament – a charge the interior minister denies.

(Reporting By Andrew MacAskill; Editing by Elaine Hardcastle)

Free America Network Articles

Leave a Reply

Next Post

What to Expect With Gilead Sciences Inc.'s Q1 Earnings Results

Gilead Sciences‘ (NASDAQ: GILD) last quarterly earnings update in February sounded kind of like a broken record. The news in the fourth quarter of 2017 was very similar to Gilead’s results for earlier quarters in the year. The big biotech will provide an update on its first-quarter performance on Tuesday, […]