Bernie Sanders tries to outdo Elizabeth Warren with tougher wealth tax proposal

FAN Editor

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) (R) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) greet each other at the start of the Democratic Presidential Debate at the Fox Theatre July 30, 2019 in Detroit, Michigan.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Sen. Bernie Sanders unveiled a tax on wealth Tuesday as he aims to cut income inequality and fund his sprawling social programs. 

The 2020 Democratic presidential candidate’s proposal follows a similar plan from Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat who has made a wealth tax a centerpiece of her presidential campaign. But the measure from Sanders, who has long railed against an economic system that he says favors corporations and the rich, would tax the richest Americans’ assets more heavily than his rival’s. 

The Sanders campaign said the levy would apply to net worth above $32 million and raise an estimated $4.35 trillion over the next 10 years. It plans to put the funds toward an affordable housing plan, universal child care and Medicare for All — the candidate’s signature proposal. The campaign said the tax would cut the wealth of billionaires in half over 15 years. 

“I don’t think that billionaires should exist,” Sanders told The New York Times in an interview. “This proposal does not eliminate billionaires, but it eliminates a lot of the wealth that billionaires have, and I think that’s exactly what we should be doing.”

The Vermont independent’s plan adds another wrinkle to a primary race shaped by Democrats’ efforts to rein in the excesses of the largest U.S. businesses and wealthiest Americans. Pockets of the business and investing community have warned about Sanders and Warren’s policies hurting the economy — though the candidates have worn the criticism as a badge of honor. 

Democrats have also looked for ways to finance vast expansions in government spending on health care and student loan forgiveness, among other programs. Sanders and Warren, two of the top contenders for the Democratic nomination, have usually ranked as the top choices among primary voters who identify themselves as liberal. 

Under his wealth tax, Sanders proposes these rates for married couples:

  • A 1% tax on net worth above $32 million
  • A 2% tax on net worth between $50 million $250 million
  • A 3% tax on net worth between $250 million and $500 million
  • A 4% tax on net worth between $500 million and $1 billion
  • A 5% tax on net worth between $1 billion and $2.5 billion
  • A 6% tax on net worth between $2.5 billion $5 billion
  • A 7% tax on net worth between $5 billion and $10 billion
  • A 8% tax on net worth above $10 billion
  • All of those brackets would be cut in half for single filers

By comparison, Warren’s plan would slap a 2% annual tax on net worth above $50 million. It would tax household net worth above $1 billion at 3%. 

Her campaign said it would raise an estimated $2.75 trillion over a decade. 

It is unclear if either candidate would even be able to impose a wealth tax or if the Supreme Court would strike it down before they could. Warren’s campaign has pointed to arguments from scholars in justifying the legality of her plan. The Sanders campaign did the same Tuesday. 

It leaned in large part on a column from Yale Law School professors Bruce Ackerman and Anne Alstott arguing for a wealth tax. 

Free America Network Articles

Leave a Reply

Next Post

Here are the biggest analyst calls of the day: Apple, Netflix, Disney, Snap, Wynn & more

Robert Iger, Chief Executive Officer of Disney, poses in “Star Wars: Galaxy’s Edge” during a media preview event at Disneyland Park in Anaheim, California, May 29, 2019. Mario Anzuoni | Reuters Here are the biggest calls on Wall Street on Tuesday: RBC raised its price target on Alphabet to $1,500 […]