- Why farmers may be disappointed with China deal
- Pelosi says Trump had a "meltdown" in meeting with congressional leaders
- Cars burn in Barcelona as protesters ignore calls for calm
- What remains to be done in the final phase of America's war on ISIS
- Parents of slain gay man chide Trump’s attorney general over LGBT rights
In announcing a preliminary touted the accord as “the greatest and biggest deal ever made for our Great Patriot Farmers in the history of our Country.” Yet questions remain about how great and big the pact ultimately will prove to be for U.S. farmers., President Donald Trump
The deal calls for China to buy between $40 billion and $50 billion a year in American farm products, according to U.S. trade officials. Experts are skeptical such a goal is achievable.
The reason: Chinese imports of U.S. soybeans, pork and other agricultural commodities peaked in 2013 at $29 billion, according to U.S. government data. The trade war pushed that figure down to $9 billion last year. As a result, simply restoring Chinese purchase of U.S. farm products to 2013 levels would be a “big achievement,” Arthur Kroeber, an analyst with investor advisory firm Gavekal Research, said in a note to clients this week.
Another potential wrinkle is that China’s commitment to buying more U.S. farm goods is contingent on their needs and on market prices, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. China may be pushing for the U.S. to drop plans for new 15% tariffs on $156 billion in consumer goods due to take effect December 15, using the farm purchases as leverage, the Journal noted.
“Shocking! You mean China’s not going to buy $40-50 billion in ag products until our tariffs are lifted? Couldn’t have seen that one coming,” Farmers for Free Trade, a lobbying group that opposes the tariffs, said in a sarcastic tweet Wednesday.
“Even with the enormous emphasis President Trump places on restarting U.S. agricultural exports to China, details about the pace of expected Chinese purchases of $40 billion to $50 billion of American farm products are murky. Nothing is on paper yet,” Mary E. Lovely, an economist at Syracuse University wrote in a piece for the Peterson Institute for International Economics, where she is a senior fellow.
Beijing confirmed to reporters Tuesday it will increase agricultural purchases from the U.S., but didn’t offer specifics, the Journal reported.
Meanwhile, even if China does rev up its purchases of U.S. farm products, it won’t make up for the losses some farmers have already incurred, said Rick Telesz, a soybean and corn farmer in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania. He made the remarks ahead of last week’s U.S.-China talks during an Oct. 10 webcast set up by Tariffs Hurt the Heartland, a coalition of industry groups coalition opposed to the trade taxes.
Compared to “what the tarffis did over the long range, it’s a fraction of a percentage of the actual loss,” Telesz said.
“One purchase, whether it’s a contract for 100 million metric tons of soybeans this month, versus what was lost or what they’re not doing in 12 months following, is minimal,” Telesz explained. “So sure, it makes for a great headline, everybody thinks things are going right direction, but in reality there’s no guarantee that market is going to be there in the following months.”
China wants more talks to hammer out specifics before signing what the White House called a “Phase One” deal with China, Bloomberg reported Monday, citing people familiar with the discussions. Mr. Trump said in announcing the deal last week that it will take several weeks to hammer out specifics.