- Oil slides as OPEC ties supply cut to Russia; Moscow said to only back limited move
- Time Warner Center, including CNN, evacuated due to bomb threat
- China November new loans seen rebounding after worrying October: Reuters Poll
- Huawei CFO to appear in Canada court in U.S. extradition case
- China's Huawei appoints chairman as acting CFO after executive's arrest
William Barr, the man multiple sources say President Donald Trump has told advisers he intends to nominate as his next attorney general, is no stranger to the job.
He’s been attorney general before — under President George H. W. Bush. And in that position, he once oversaw Robert Mueller, the current special counsel, when he headed up the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.
If nominated and confirmed, he would replace Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, who’s held the top post since Trump fired Jeff Sessions last month.
Here’s everything you need to know about the man who could, at a critical moment, become Trump’s attorney general.
Name: William Pelham Barr
Age: 68 (born May 23, 1950)
Hometown: New York, New York
What he used to do: Barr served as Attorney General under President George H.W. Bush for two years, after previously working in both the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel and as Deputy Attorney General. He sailed through the Senate confirmation process in November 1991, receiving unanimous approval via a Senate voice vote. He served until the end of Bush’s presidency in 1993.
Barr, a Columbia University graduate, worked at the CIA while attending the George Washington University Law School at night. He clerked for the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals before working for roughly a decade as a lawyer in private practice.
Since leaving the Bush administration, Barr has returned to private practice, including over a decade as the general counsel for Verizon. Barr is currently an attorney for Kirkland and Ellis, a high-profile Washington, D.C., law firm.
His views on the Russia investigation: Barr has remained neutral on whether or not the Mueller probe is legitimate, but he has both written and spoken about many topics relating to players in the investigation.
Barr wrote that Comey “crossed a line that is fundamental to the allocation of authority in the Justice Department” in announcing the outcome of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.
On another Clinton-related investigative topic, Barr told The New York Times in November of last year he believed that there was more justification for the Department of Justice to investigate Clinton’s role in approving a 2010 sale of U.S. uranium stockpiles to a Russian energy company in what is commonly known as the “Uranium One” deal, than for investigating any potential collusion between President Trump and Russians.
Barr said that not pursuing an investigation of “Uranium One” would be evidence that “the department is abdicating its responsibility.”
Barr also raised concerns about special counsel Mueller’s appointment of prosecutors with a history of donating to Democratic candidates, telling The Washington Post in July 2017 that he “would have liked to see him have more balance on this group.”