- Special counsel Mueller has no sealed indictments as Russia probe ends: NBC News
- Explainer: How much of the Mueller report must U.S. attorney general disclose?
- Trump dangles investment to Caribbean leaders who back Venezuela’s Guaido
- No. 1 seed Virginia rallies to dominate Gardner-Webb
- Utilities ETFs Shine in a Low-Yield, Risk-Off Environment
Senate Republicans are taking Attorney General Jeff Sessions’in stride, just months after many Republicans initially threatened President Trump with consequences if he fired Sessions. Mr. Trump had repeatedly bashed Sessions for recusing himself from the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, which allowed Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to appoint special counsel Robert Mueller.
In July 2017, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham told CNN that he was “100 percent behind” Sessions, his former Senate colleague, and that “if Jeff Sessions is fired, there will be holy hell to pay.” Retiring Republican Sen. Jeff Flake said in August that firing Sessions would be a “big mistake.”
Graham recently backed away from those statements, telling reporters in August that it was “very likely” that Sessions would be replaced and that “the president is entitled to an attorney general he has faith in.”
Graham tweeted Tuesday afternoon that “Jeff Sessions served our nation well and honorably.” He added in another tweet, “I look forward to working with President @realDonaldTrump to find a confirmable, worthy successor so that we can start a new chapter at the Department of Justice and deal with both the opportunities and challenges our nation faces.”
Flake, on the other hand, called for action to protect Mueller’s investigation in a Twitter post. “Earlier this year, we passed S.2644, the Special Counsel Independence and Integrity Act, out of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The bill would safeguard Robert Mueller’s investigation. Leader McConnell should bring the bill to the Senate floor as soon as possible,” Flake wrote.
Other prominent Republicans echoed Graham’s bland statements on Sessions’ forced resignation. Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley tweeted his gratitude to Sessions, and wrote that he had “enjoyed working with him for decades.” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wrote in a statement that he wished Sessions “well and look forward to working with him in any future endeavors.”
Some Democrats expressed concerned that Sessions’ departure could interfere with the Russia investigation. Sen. Mark Warner, ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement that “any effort to interfere with the Special Counsel’s investigation would be a gross abuse of power by the President.”
Rep. Jerry Nadler, the next chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said on Twitter that “Americans must have answers immediately as to the reasoning” behind Sessions’ departure. “Why is the President making this change and who has authority over Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation? We will be holding people accountable,” he added.
Rep. Adam Schiff, the incoming chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement that “interference with the Special Counsel’s investigation would cause a constitutional crisis and undermine the rule of law.”
“If the President seeks to interfere in the impartial administration of justice, the Congress must stop him. No one is above the law,” he said.
Sessions submitted his resignation at Mr. Trump’s request on Wednesday afternoon. His chief of staff, expressed skepticism over Mueller’s investigation, and wrote in 2016 in USA Today that he would have indicted Hillary Clinton., will serve as acting attorney general and will take oversight of the Russia investigation from Rosenstein. Whitaker has previously
© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.