Here’s why your Social Security check doesn’t go as far as it once did

FAN Editor

If you’ve been thinking that your Social Security check doesn’t go as far as it used to, you’re likely not imagining it.

Since 2000, the buying power of monthly benefits has fallen by 34 percent, according to a recent report from the Senior Citizens League, an advocacy group based in Alexandria, Virginia.

In other words, the collective cost of goods and services common among retirees has risen faster than the cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, that Social Security recipients get every year.

“People who recently retired might have seen only a [small] decrease in buying power,” said Mary Johnson, a policy analyst for the league. “But those retired for a long time are feeling the cumulative effect of this.”

About 47 million older Americans receive Social Security. Overall, the benefits comprise about a third of income among those age 65 or older, according to the Social Security Administration.

The league’s annual report examines the costs that typically comprise household budgets of older Americans and compares their price change with annual COLAs.

Based on those comparisons, the research found a 4 percent loss in Social Security buying power from January 2017 to January 2018 and a 34 percent decrease since 2000.

While COLA increases since 2000 cumulatively have equaled 46 percent — matching inflation over those years — typical retiree expenses grew by 96.3 percent, the study shows.

Of the 39 costs analyzed in the report, 26 grew faster than the percentage increase in COLAs from 2000 to 2018.

Housing and medical outlays top the list of fastest-growing expenses that retirees face. For example, average Medicare Part B premiums have risen 195 percent, to $134 from $45.50 in 2000.

“It’s not a pretty picture,” Johnson said. “It’s difficult when costs are increasing so much more quickly than COLAs.”

Johnson said the report uses 2000 as a baseline because that’s when federal changes to how U.S. inflation is measured were fully implemented. Social Security COLAs are based on that measurement, called the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers.

Critics say the formula fails to consider the different spending patterns exhibited by retirees compared with the U.S. population at large.

Johnson’s group is among those that advocate for a different index — the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly — to be used to determine Social Security COLAs.

Since 2010, the average COLA has been 1.2 percent. Most recently, there was no COLA in 2016, followed by a 0.3 percent boost in 2017. While 2018 brought a 2 percent increase, many retirees saw the extra money go toward their Medicare Part B premium.

Johnson estimates that the COLA for 2019 will be at least 3.3 percent, which could help mute some of the loss of buying power year over year. The Social Security Administration will announce next year’s COLA in October.

More from Personal Finance:
New GOP plan pushes savings accounts that come with tax break
8 books that can help you increase your net worth
How to save on your summer rental car

Free America Network Articles

Leave a Reply

Next Post

Bank of America downgrades Intel, says 'biggest risk' remains unresolved

Bank of America Merrill Lynch downgraded shares of Intel on Friday to “neutral” from “buy” after second-quarter results left what the firm’s analysts call the chipmaker’s “biggest risk” unresolved. Intel’s earnings revealed that its 10-nanometer chip production process would arrive in the second half of next year, meaning its next […]