GenMark Diagnostics Inc (GNMK) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

FAN Editor

GenMark Diagnostics Inc (NASDAQ: GNMK)

Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 21, 2019, 4:30 p.m. ET

Continue Reading Below

Contents:

  • Prepared Remarks
  • Questions and Answers
  • Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to today’s conference call to discuss GenMark Diagnostics’ Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Financial Results. My name is Carmen and I’ll be your operator on this call.

After the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Instructions will be provided at that time. (Operator Instructions). Please note that this call is being recorded today, Thursday, February 21, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. Pacific time and will be available on the Investors section of GenMark’s website at www.genmarkdx.com.

I would now like to turn the meeting over to Leigh Salvo of Gilmartin Group.

Leigh SalvoInvestor Relations

Thanks Carmen. And thank you all very much for joining us today. Before we begin, I would like to inform you that certain statements made by GenMark during the course of this call may constitute forward-looking statements. Any statement about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are forward-looking statements. For example, statements concerning our 2019 financial guidance, the development, regulatory clearance, commercialization and features of new products, plans and objectives of management and market trends are all forward-looking statements. We believe these statements are based on reasonable assumptions.

However, these statements are not guarantees of performance and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such statements. Important factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in these forward-looking statements are detailed in GenMark’s filings with the SEC. GenMark assumes no obligation and expressly disclaims any duty to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after this call or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

I’d now like to turn the conference call over to Hany Massarany, President and CEO of GenMark. Hany?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Lee. And good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us. Before we review our 2018 results and objectives for 2019, I’d like to comment on the management changes we announced in our press release earlier this afternoon. I’m delighted that effective today Scott Mendel is assuming the newly created role of Chief Operating Officer and Johnny Ek has been promoted to Chief Financial Officer after serving as our Corporate Controller for the past five years.

As COO, Scott will be responsible for our entire product delivery process from new product development through product manufacturing and supply. In his new role, Scott will lead to our integrated product development, manufacturing, and quality organizations to further our mission of delivering the most innovative and highest quality molecular diagnostic solutions to meet our customer needs and help improve patient outcomes.

A fundamental aspect of this mission is our continued focus on delivering ePlex gross margin improvements to achieve our target of 60% plus over the next two years to three years. As we continue to drive revenue growth and business expansion, we must also optimize our organizational structure and processes to enable effective decision making and sustained focus on our most important initiatives, including leading edge product innovation, operational excellence, and world-class commercialization.

We are very pleased with the strong market adoption of our ePlex system and of course this will continue to be a significant business priority in 2019 and beyond. It’s also crucial that we accelerate all efforts to drive manufacturing efficiency and gross margin. And I strongly believe that aligning our product delivery functions and processes under Scott’s leadership will enable us to deliver on these important imperatives.

We’re also pleased to have an excellent finance team and strong processes, which will enable a smooth transition of the CFO role from Scott to Johnny. Since joining GenMark in 2013, Johnny has made significant contributions to the company and played a pivotal role in our finance organization. His GenMark experience, leadership skills, and his thorough knowledge of our financial operations make him the obvious choice as our new CFO. Johnny is a great addition to our executive team and has the full confidence of our entire organization and Board of Directors.

Turning to our agenda for the call today, I’ll begin with a brief review of 2018 and recent highlights that have positioned us for a strong 2019 and beyond. I’ll then turn the call over to Scott to review our fourth quarter and full year 2018 results as well as our financial guidance for 2019. I’ll conclude the call with a summary of our objectives and goals for this year. Then we will open the call for questions.

Looking back on 2018. We ended the year focused on driving ePlex market adoption and test menu expansion, as well as improving manufacturing cost and yield efficiencies. I’m proud of what we’ve been able to accomplish in 2018, including the substantial progress that we made across the many goals that we set for our organization, both short and longer term.

Briefly, this past year on the ePlex commercialization front, we saw solid execution by our commercial team, which resulted in ePlex revenue surpassing XT-8 revenue early in the year. A severe 2017, 2018 flu season was certainly a factor, but more importantly the uniquely differentiated value proposition of our ePlex system together with its excellent performance in the field, continue to fuel revenue growth throughout the year.

We ended 2018 with a global installed base of 354 ePlex analyzers compared to 196 at year end 2017, an increase of 81%. We placed ePlex systems both in small hospitals that had never previously performed molecular testing, but saw the value of near patient rapid testing as well as in some of the largest and most strategic testing labs in the world where ePlex’s workflow and integration are driving significant efficiencies.

In 2018, we made important investments in our commercial infrastructure. In the US, we successfully recruited top tier talent to end the year with 30 field sales personnel. Over the next couple of years, we expect to expand our US sales force by more than 30%. Outside of the US, we also made good progress expanding our distributor network beyond the main central and western European geographies. While we still expect the US market to account for the vast majority of our revenue and placements in the foreseeable future, we plan to continue expanding our international reach as we selectively drive our commercial efforts in other regions of the world.

As you know ePlex menu expansion is a significant area of focus for our company, and in 2018 we made excellent progress. We successfully completed all clinical studies and submissions of our three ePlex Blood Culture ID panels to the FDA and achieved 510(k) market clearances for our Gram-Positive Panel and Fungal Pathogen Panel. We continue to anticipate clearance of our Gram-Negative panel in the near future.

We are delighted with the growing body of customer studies, peer-review journal articles and conference presentations, which further demonstrate the performance and utility of the ePlex BCID panels. This includes four peer reviewed publications, over 10 posters and presentations at major industry conferences and 10 early access evaluations ongoing at US sites. And we have several additional clinical utility and health economic studies planned for 2019.

Operationally, we significantly improved ePlex manufacturing yields throughout 2018 and I’m very pleased that our manufacturing facility was able to support our growth and customer demand, including during a very flu — very severe flu season. Last year, our engineering and supply chain teams also made meaningful improvements to the direct material and direct labor costs of our ePlex test cartridge, which significantly improved ePlex gross margin compared with 2017. Scott will elaborate on our plans to further drive manufacturing efficiencies and gross margin in 2019 and beyond.

From a top line perspective, total revenue for 2018 was $70.8 million, representing an increase of 35% over 2017. ePlex revenue for the full year was $37.9 million, an increase of more than 270% over 2017. Throughout the year, our top line performance was largely driven by the solid pace of ePlex system adoption and continued strong demand for our respiratory pathogen panel.

And from a market perspective, the multiplex molecular market continues to grow. Over the past five years or so the global respiratory multiplex testing market grew from approximately $150 million to $500 million per year. We expect syndromic testing for other infectious disease states to follow the same path, especially bloodstream and gastrointestinal infections. And with growing number of other disease states that are transitioning to multiplex molecular testing, including central nervous system, lower respiratory tract, and bone and joint infections, to name a few, we believe this market opportunity has the potential to exceed $2.5 billion annually over the next five years. As a result, we are investing in menu expansion and ongoing product innovation.

While 2019 growth will be driven by our respiratory and BCID panels, our R&D teams remain focused on menu, technology and software development for longer-term growth. Our top priority from a menu development perspective is a GI panel. In designing this panel, we carefully considered reimbursement, customer needs, and market dynamics as well as the investment and development timeline requirements. And at this stage, we’re not providing additional information regarding anticipated market availability of the GI panel, but expect to provide updates on our progress as we approach important milestones.

In addition to developing a highly differentiated assay menu, we’ve also been investing in several aspects of ePlex software functionality that create durable advantage. This includes the ability to integrate the diagnostic workflow from order to report, the ability to link the diagnostic test results to actionable information for the physician that can be customized at the lab and hospital level, and the ability to automate and eventually remotely manage the core administrative and quality control functions on a network of systems. Over the next few years, we expect to release multiple software revisions to enhance functionality in these areas and further differentiate ePlex as the platform of choice in molecular testing.

Overall, I’m pleased with what our team has accomplished in 2018 and look forward to an exciting 2019. At this point, I’ll turn the call over to Scott for his financial review and additional comments regarding guidance and operational priorities for 2019. And then I’ll be back to conclude our prepared remarks and open up the call for questions. Scott?

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Thanks, Hany. As previously mentioned our fourth quarter 2018 revenue was $19.4 million, up 21% versus the fourth quarter of 2017, with the US continuing to account for the vast majority of our sales. The average annuity per ePlex placement was $140,000 in the fourth quarter as well as for the full year of 2018. We are very pleased with this result and it provides a good basis for 2019 revenue expectations.

Fourth quarter gross profit was $5.3 million, or 27% of revenue versus $4.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, or 30% of revenue. When compared to the third quarter of 2018, gross margin decreased by 9 percentage points, driven by the shift to higher ePlex product sales relative to XT-8, which we noted on our last call. We are continuing to focus on and make progress with our manufacturing improvement initiatives to drive higher ePlex gross margins.

Total operating expenses were $15.9 million for the quarter, a decrease of $2.8 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2017. This decrease was largely due to reduced ePlex development expenses. Our net loss per share for the fourth quarter was $0.21 compared to $0.26 for the fourth quarter of 2017.

Moving onto the balance sheet, we ended the fourth quarter with $45.2 million in cash and investments. We used approximately $4.4 million of cash in the quarter excluding financing activities, which was the lowest cash used in the quarter since we began developing ePlex. The cash usage improvement was largely driven by progress we have been making on ePlex margins and strong working capital management, especially collections of accounts receivable as well as prudent inventory management.

We recently expanded and restructured our term loan agreement to provide more financial flexibility at favorable terms. The agreement added $11 million to our balance sheet, on February 1 and extended the interest only period one year beyond the previous debt facility. Also, upon reaching certain revenue milestones, we have the option to draw an additional $15 million and extend the interest only period by an additional year. There are no financial covenants associated with this new agreement.

Turning to the guidance for the full year 2019. We expect total revenue to be in the range of $85 million to $90 million. Additional placements of 170 to 190 analyzers and an average annuity per analyzer of $135,000 to $145,000. We expect more than half of our placements and revenue will be in the second half of the year, which is common in the diagnostics industry and also takes into account BCID launch timing. 2019 Gross margin is expected to be in the 28% to 30% range and operating expenses are expected to be approximately $65 million to $70 million. Taking all this into consideration, we expect another year of cash usage improvement with 2019 cash usage to be in the $25 million to $30 million range. We expect our ePlex platform to continue to drive our growth and to account for about 75% of total 2019 revenue. This would represent 70% year-over-year growth of ePlex revenues.

Before I hand the call back to Hany, I would like to take a few minutes to provide additional detail regarding our recent organizational changes. I’m excited to assume the new role of Chief Operating Officer, where I will dedicate my time to working with our talented teams across R&D, manufacturing and quality to continue delivering high quality and innovative products that meet our customer’s needs and improve patient outcomes. As Hany mentioned, driving gross margin to our target of 60% plus over the next two years to three years is a top priority. We’ve already taken several important steps toward accomplishing this important business imperative. Specifically, we have reorganized our engineering teams to drive the various aspects of manufacturing efficiency, including direct material improvements, yield, and direct labor efficiency. These new teams have already constructed multiyear funnels of opportunities which we prioritize to drive the most impact as quickly as possible. Our manufacturing and cost efficiencies improved substantially during 2018, but we still have room for improvement and we are confident that these changes position us for further success.

Based upon our (inaudible) experience and lessons learned, we believe we have the right capabilities to repeat that successful outcome. While we do not anticipate reporting manufacturing yield or specific cost per unit, we do plan to provide commentary where appropriate about key improvements being made.

With respect to our finance function, Johnny has been right beside me for the nearly five years I’ve been GenMark. We’ve worked very closely together and I’m committed to a smooth transition and confident he will be a strong Chief Financial Officer for GenMark.

And now, I’ll hand the call back to Hany for his final remarks.

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Scott. In closing, we are highly confident in the uniquely differentiated value proposition of our ePlex system and its excellent performance in the field. We believe that the strength of our respiratory panel combined with the recent launch of our BCID panels and enhanced software functionality will further differentiate ePlex as the platform of choice in molecular testing.

This year we will remain laser focused on driving ePlex placements, revenue growth, and gross margin improvement while continuing to advance product innovation and operational excellence. We’ve taken significant steps to ensure that we can deliver on these goals, including expanding our commercial team and organizing our R&D and manufacturing functions under one common leadership to deliver the highest quality products that will satisfy customer needs. We believe this year will be another exciting and successful year for our company, our customers, and our investors.

At this time Scott, Johnny, and I would like to open the call for your questions. Thanks.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our first question is from Brian Weinstein with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Brian WeinsteinWilliam Blair — Analyst

Hi guys, thanks for taking the questions. I appreciate it. So let me just talk a little bit about gross margin, you guys have identified steps that you’re taking to improve gross margin, but the guidance is still kind of 20% to 30% and I think you just did 27% in Q4. So there’s a little bit of improvement there, but what’s holding that back in the near term considering all those things that you guys have identified. Did it just take longer to put into place or why wouldn’t gross margin be a little bit better next year?

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Sure, Brian. This is Scott. I’ll handle that question. One of the things to note is in our guidance we gave an indication of how much of our revenue in 2019 is expected to be driven by ePlex. So there’s quite a bit of mix shift happening between 2018 and 2019 that needs to be taken into consideration when looking at the overall gross margin. To be more specific, in 2018 ePlex was about 50% of our overall revenue and that’s moving up to the 75% range. So the guidance on overall gross margin reflects that mix shift. The teams have been making really good progress in 2018 and we continue to expect to build on that progress in 2019. Much of the improvement in 2018 was driven by manufacturing yield and getting that to the range that we want to be in, but that’s what’s really driving the overall gross margin is really the mix shift. And once you take that into consideration you can see we’re driving some really strong ePlex gross margin improvement.

Brian WeinsteinWilliam Blair — Analyst

And just to stick on the gross margin theme, the 60% target, Hany I think you said two years to three years is where you think you can get — when you can get the gross margin at that level, coming from 30 this year, it’s a doubling. So that’s a long way away, have you identified all of the steps at this point that are required to get there? And what are the biggest steps that are — that you have to put in place? Can you kind of walk us through kind of rank order of what’s the biggest things are that you are going to be doing other than mix shift, which I guess will turn more positive just as ePlex gets more profitability, but beyond that just the specific manufacturing improvements that you guys have identified?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Thank you, Brian. I’ll start and then I’ll hand over to Scott to sort of build on my comments in his new capacity as COO in charge of all this. Look, we have very good plan in place. We’ve been working on this as you know, Brian for a long time now and our teams have put together a comprehensive plan. Scott mentioned multi-year prioritized initiatives that will get us there over a period of time. Look of course volume is going to play a big part of it and absorption of our facilities and sort of overheads etcetera, but also continued improvements in relation to yield direct labor and direct material.

So we have opportunities that we know we can pursue to get there. This is work — good work that we’ve been doing over time now. So this isn’t sort of like some new thing that we’ve come up with. We’ve done it before with XT-8, we know what it takes we have a good plan in place. And under Scott’s leadership with the team that put this plan together, we’re really committed to driving and getting the — to the outcomes that we expect over the next few years.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

And I’ll just add a couple of points to that Brian. If you think — if you look at where we’ve been with ePlex gross margins, we exited 2017 with negative gross margin. We improve that substantially as we moved through 2018. In fact, exiting 2018 we’d improved ePlex gross margin to about double-digit. In 2019 in the guidance that we provided that would expect of another two to three times improvement over where we exited 2018. So we are driving that toward that 60% plus gross margin target that Hany spoke about in pretty rapid timeline.

The biggest drivers, as Hany mentioned, is first stabilizing manufacturing yield to the range that we’ve been able to achieve with XT-8. Just to give a little more insight, we expect manufacturing yields to be in the 90% to 95% range. We’re not quite there yet, we’ve made tremendous progress and that’s what drove the majority of the gross margin improvement in 2018. We’ll get a little bit more from that here in 2019, but then as Hany mentioned overhead absorption.

The specific initiatives that the engineering teams are driving to reduce direct material whether that’s finding alternative suppliers or looking at the amount of material we use as we’re manufacturing the consumable. Those are some examples of how we are driving down direct material and then obviously direct labor is more about process improvements and reducing the amount of handling time on the lines in addition to automation. So that’s kind of the order that we’re going through and that’s the main priorities that I’ll be working on with the engineering, manufacturing and quality teams.

Brian WeinsteinWilliam Blair — Analyst

Great. Nice job, guys and congrats Scott, happy for you. Thank you.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. And our next question comes from Mark Massaro with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Mark MassaroCanaccord Genuity — Analyst

Hey guys, thanks for taking the questions. Wanted to start on the guide, it was higher than my expectations and above the Street. And so, I really wanted to ask, how are you guys contemplating the contribution from blood cultured ID in 2019. If we just take the midpoint to last — to the 2018 you get about $16.7 million of revenue growth for 2019. So I’m wondering how much of that will be growth of respiratory panel versus contribution from the new BCID products?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

All right, I’ll take a crack at this, Mark. Thanks for the question and then Scott if it is required. Mark, we’ve done a very thorough assessment. So we are starting with a bottom-up analysis of our funnel and have good visibility to where we will be winning new business versus expanding sort of our business with existing customers. So we feel pretty good about the range that we’re guiding to and we don’t, as you know, split revenues up by product line. We expect that blood culture ID panels will take longer to and implement and sort of putting routine use compared with respiratory. Respiratory panels have been in use for some time now, the market is well penetrated and it’s — it doesn’t take as long for customers to do the necessary work to transition to molecular syndromic panels. So we do expect that BCID will take a little bit longer. As you know, we also have two of the three panels we didn’t get clearance until very late last year. So we are in the process of launching BCID, while waiting on the final clearance from FDA, which we expect very shortly. So I believe that we’ve correctly sort of baked the BCID opportunity in our guidance and we’ve feel good about that.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Yeah, I will just add one — Mark, I’ll just add one point to that, as far as guidance goes in revenue, it’s important to note now that we’re through our first year plus of ePlex being on market that we have a sizable installed base. That installed base and the earnings power or the annuity per placement gives us really strong visibility into a very large portion of the revenue guide that we just gave. So back to Hany’s, point we did factor BCID in, but the majority of that revenue comes from our installed base and annuity we’re earning off that installed base. So lot more visibility and we feel really that the guidance range that we gave is appropriate.

Mark MassaroCanaccord Genuity — Analyst

Wonderful. And just my final question, you’re going up against the historic flu season relative to last year, but CDC flu data is rising which likely bodes well for this year’s flu season. But can you just give us a sense on your expectations for respiratory panel demand here in Q1. Just with respect to going up against a difficult comp, is there any way you think your respiratory panel testing can grow on a year-over-year basis?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, thanks Mark. Look our ePlex respiratory IP business is growing notwithstanding the difficult comp like you said. So the flu season is how we have predicted it and how we’re modeling it in our guidance. It started — it was like in the fourth quarter and certainly it sort of there was a — it picked up more recently, but it’s still a moderate season as we’ve modeled it and we are nowhere near as severe as the first quarter of last year. But notwithstanding that our business is growing because we’ve placed a lot more systems throughout the year, we’ve secured a lot of customers. So while the same customers that perhaps we had in Q1 of last year aren’t necessarily — aren’t going to do more testing, but we’ve grown installed base of respiratory users out there and we’re going to show some, we believe some growth over Q1 of 2018.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Correct. And I would just add to Hany’s point. We’ll probably show some growth, even though it was a tough comp, but I think ePlex revenue growth will probably be around 20% Mark. So we feel good about where we’re at and that’s assuming we kind of have this moderate flu season as we progress through the end of the first quarter.

Mark MassaroCanaccord Genuity — Analyst

Great. And congratulations to Johnny.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is from Tycho Peterson with J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.

JuliaJ.P. Morgan — Analyst

Hey guys, thanks for taking the question. This is Julia (ph) on for Tycho for today. So maybe starting off with BCID, could you just give an update on the expected timeline for getting your Gram-Negative panel approved, is still within the end of this first quarter?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. We hope so Julia. We are on track. The process is going well. We’re very pleased with the way that we’re interacting with FDA. There is nothing to lead us to believe that this will be delayed. We’re always of course cautious about making definite sort of commitments about date since we’re not in charge of the FDA, but based on what we know and how the process has gone so far, we hope that we have clearance this quarter — by the end of the quarter.

JuliaJ.P. Morgan — Analyst

Got it. And then in terms of your ePlex order funnel. I know you mentioned that you are already kind of starting the commercial launch process, while you’re awaiting approval for that third panel. So based on your visibility into the funnel (inaudible) do you feel like most people are already placing orders knowing that they can anticipate the Gram-negative panel approval soon or is number of customers still holding back until they wait to see that final approval. Just trying to gauge how much potential upside or visibility do you have into the expected ePlex placement?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, good question and it’s a mix, right. So in general, I would say our customers see the three panels as a sort of a family of panels. So, of course, they expect to have access to all of those panels, eventually, but many of our customers are comfortable to start the process because it takes time to do the validations and sort of the work in the lab. The evaluation and implementation and so on to transition to routine use and they would do those sequentially anyways.

So we have a number of customers that are already moving forward and even if some will wait until all three are available. Keep in mind Julia that we received clearance very late last year, I think it was like the 28th or whatever it was like, literally the last few days in December, we — and we had our global sales meeting, not that long ago where we officially launched our sales force, we’ve conducted training, launch tools etcetera and we expected that In the first quarter, depending on how severe the flu season would be and how busy, our customers would be that would also be a factor in terms of their ability to sort of focus on a different panel. But overall, all of this is going as we expected and we’ve factored all of this in our guidance for this year.

JuliaJ.P. Morgan — Analyst

Got it. And then finally and terms of — hello?

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Go ahead Julia.

JuliaJ.P. Morgan — Analyst

Yeah, OK. Finally, in terms of international expansion, could you give us more detail over what time frame do you plan to take steps and you know when can we expect to see a tangible revenue impact from that assigned footprint?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. We’ve already taken many steps. We have now fully implemented our hybrid model that we spoke about a year or so ago. So in the Central and Western European countries, we now have exclusive distributors working hand-in-hand with our small sort of dedicated, focused team in those countries, but we’ve also expanded our direct distributor — not direct, but distributor channels and partnerships into other countries including in Eastern Europe.

As well as last year, we’ve signed up multiple distribution agreements in Middle Eastern countries. We haven’t yet started on Asia-Pacific or LATAM. We’ve done a lot of work and met with potential partners and so on, but we haven’t yet initiated any distributor agreements in those markets. So we will continue to expand our very selectively our international reach outside of the US, but I think it’s important for everyone to realize that the vast majority of our business is going to come from the US. This isn’t unique to GenMark necessarily, but this is where the US is the biggest market for our product solutions and that will continue to be the case for years to come.

JuliaJ.P. Morgan — Analyst

Got it. Thank you and congrats Johnny (ph) I know you well.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Derik De Bruin with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Go ahead.

IvyBank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

Hi, this is Ivy (ph) for Derik today. So to start off, just wanted to see how should we think about the headwinds to the placements from the reimbursement challenges, we talked about last year or how much of that is baked into the guide that’s provided today? Thanks.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Sure. Ivy, this is Scott. I’ll answer that question. Regarding reimbursement as we talked about last year, the majority of our business is inpatient and we expected really minimal impact from the recent reimbursement draft put out. And that’s actually how it played out. We have not felt anything from a reimbursement perspective relative to RP business in the fourth quarter and so that is in line with what we had communicated. We’ll continue to keep an eye on it, but right now we’re not seeing any impact.

IvyBank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

I see, thank you, Scott. And congrats on your role, and then I just want to have a — I mean housekeeping question, how should we think about the R&D spending for next year, or for the out years with the BCID expenses winding down, but the GI is still going for the next foreseeable future. So just wanted to see if there is any additional color there? Thanks.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Sure. So I gave operating expense guidance overall, but I can share a little more color on R&D specifically, I would expect R&D to be lower than it was in 2018, really by virtue of the fact that we had three clinical trials being run during 2018 versus where right here in 2019. So Ivy I think, R&D expense will come down slightly in 2019 reflecting that fact.

IvyBank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

I see. Thank you, guys. Last one, just how should we think about the higher sale approach that you guys provide?

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

The annuity per placement?

IvyBank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

Yes.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Yes. So that was based on where we finished in the prior year. So in 2018 our annuity per placement ran right around $140,000 for the full year. That’s the midpoint of the guidance range that we provided for 2019. When setting our guidance range for 2019, we took into account our experience last year adjusted for the fact that it was an extraordinary flu season, but then also added back in what we expect to happen from a BCID pull-through on top of RP. So net-net we landed at about the same place that we had experienced in 2018, a $140,000 at the midpoint of our guidance.

IvyBank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

I see. That makes a lot of sense. Thanks Scott and congrats on you role and congrats as well. Thank you.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. And our next question comes from Mike Matson with Needham & Company. Please go ahead.

David JacksonNeedham & Company — Analyst

Hi, good afternoon, this is David Jackson (ph) on for Mike. Thanks for taking the questions. Just wondering, can you give some — well add just a little more specifics on how you’re preparing for the BCID launches and also just the impact you’re expecting to gross margin, if any?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, thanks for the question. So we have been working for some time now on the BCID launch in anticipation of FDA clearance. As we said, we have now two of the three panels and hopefully the third one will come soon, but in the meantime we had been working with a number of key opinion leaders in the US to develop studies or to complete studies and to generate data, which — some of which was presented last year at some of the industry meetings that I’m sure you all are familiar with. So we have been ahead of clearance working under sort of research use only agreements with a number of key opinion leaders to complete those studies and to generate the data and presentations, etcetera. We’ve done that elsewhere in the world as well.

And as I mentioned in the prepared remarks there is now a substantial and a growing body of data and evidence generated by customers to sort of demonstrate the utility and the performance of our BCID panels how they compare to alternatives. More recently, we had our global sales meeting last month where we launched our sales force, the programs that will be implemented starting right away to launch BCID in the US market and continue to drive adoption elsewhere in the world.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

And then I’ll add to — answer the second part of question. So from a gross margin perspective, the nice part about our ePlex consumable is it’s — well it is universal consumable so therefore all the improvements that we have made that positively impact RP are applicable to manufacturing our Blood Culture ID panels. In fact what we expect to happen is as you add on BCID volume, it helps drive overall overhead absorption and we’ve incorporated that into the guidance that we provided. So net, net, a positive as we launch this new panels.

David JacksonNeedham & Company — Analyst

Great. And then Scott, congrats on the promotion, you’ve talked a little bit about manufacturing improvements you’re working on in targeting. I’m just curious what milestones can you call out for us on outside?

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Yes, I think the most important one is overall gross margin. So like I said from time to time, I’ll provide some commentary on key improvements we made, examples of improvement, etcetera, but I’m not going to be adding additional metrics. The overarching metric that we want to look at is gross margin and specifically you can look at our footnotes or financials and see what revenue comes from ePlex versus XT-8. And then you can chart our progress, how we are progressing on ePlex gross margins by looking at that split. So that’s ultimately the measure that will be verifiable externally.

David JacksonNeedham & Company — Analyst

Great. Thank you and congrats on the quarter.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. And our next question comes from Sung Ji Nam with BTIG. Please go ahead.

Sung Ji NamBTIG — Analyst

Hi, thanks for taking the question. Maybe a follow-up on the sales funnel question for ePlex particularly for the BCID driven platforms I was curious if you guys might be able to provide more color in terms of the breakdown between customers who currently use existing or your competitive platforms versus the ones that are new to multiplex automated multiplex syndromic panel testing?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Can you clarify the question again Sung Ji, you’re asking how many of the opportunities or what sort of percentage of the opportunities are already existing RP users or — is that what you’re –?

Sung Ji NamBTIG — Analyst

I’m sorry. Existing users of competitive platforms. Folks that are new to the whole syndromic molecular testing?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. So what we’ve been experiencing is that about a third of our customers are new to syndromic versus competitive displacement. Obviously that’s largely based on our RP experience because we just launched BCID I would expect that would increase the proportion of new to syndromic would increase because BCID is less penetrated from molecular perspective, but it’s been running about a third new to syndromic.

Sung Ji NamBTIG — Analyst

Okay, great. And then for the gastrointestinal panel, sorry I, if I missed it, but should we anticipate any potential updates or milestones throughout the year, do you expect to release some data around that or any kind of updates there throughout the year?

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

I think as we get to important milestones we will provide updates.

Sung Ji NamBTIG — Analyst

Okay. And then just lastly, I was wondering if you guys might be willing to share the installed base for XT-8 at this point?

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Yes, it is 575.

Sung Ji NamBTIG — Analyst

Great, thank you so much.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. And our last question is from John Hsu with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

John HsuRaymond James — Analyst

Thank you. First off, I just wanted to ask, just if you could just go back from a strategic standpoint, obviously congratulations to Scott and Johnny, but maybe just can you walk us through why a company of this size and maybe why now a COO is the right is the right person to add?

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Yes. So I’ll start and Hany can jump in. One of the motivations for us making this change was gross margin improvement is a key priority both inside the company as well as important to our shareholders. And so, why now is because we’ve launched our platform we have many panels cleared and on the market. And now we’re focused on commercialization and gross margin improvement. By making this move now, it allows me to dedicate all of my time to help driving gross margin improvement and also allows Hany to focus more of his time on a day-to-day basis on commercial and strategy.

John HsuRaymond James — Analyst

Okay, great. That’s, definitely helpful. And I guess just one other one for me, I did get that you still expect the gross margins to tick up the low 60s over the next two to three years. I believe there was a revenue figure tied to that. So is $150 million the right way to think about maybe the longer-term revenue that might be implied by that the gross margin ramp?

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Yes, it’s probably somewhere in that range. We used $150 million as our target to get to cash flow positivity more than where we achieved gross margin at 60%. I think the gross margin 60% plus over the next two to three years is really indicative of the funnel of opportunities that we have and how we are sequencing those opportunities to deliver gross margin improvement.

John HsuRaymond James — Analyst

Okay, great thanks for taking the questions.

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Thanks John.

Operator

Thank you. And sir, I’m not showing any further questions in the queue.

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

All right. We’ll thank you for your time this afternoon and for your continued support everyone. Look forward to updating you on our progress in the coming quarters. Thanks very much. Have a good day. Bye-bye.

Operator

And ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us. This concludes the program and you may all disconnect, have a wonderful day.

Duration: ?? minutes

Call participants:

Leigh SalvoInvestor Relations

Hany MassaranyPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Scott MendelChief Operating Officer

Brian WeinsteinWilliam Blair — Analyst

Mark MassaroCanaccord Genuity — Analyst

JuliaJ.P. Morgan — Analyst

IvyBank of America Merrill Lynch — Analyst

David JacksonNeedham & Company — Analyst

Sung Ji NamBTIG — Analyst

John HsuRaymond James — Analyst

More GNMK analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company’s SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

10 stocks we like better than GenMark DiagnosticsWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and GenMark Diagnostics wasn’t one of them! That’s right — they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of January 31, 2019

Motley Fool Transcribers has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Free America Network Articles

Leave a Reply

Next Post

NetEase Posts Another Quarter of Accelerating Sales Growth

NetEase (NASDAQ: NTES) reported its fourth-quarter earnings on Feb. 20. Its revenue rose 36% annually to RMB 19.84 billion ($2.89 billion), which missed the USD guidance by $20 million but marked its third straight quarter of accelerating sales growth. NetEase’s non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) net income rose 26% annually […]